Thin Slice This, Baby! Dog Owners Determined Outcome In Local Elections
For dog owners in many cities and towns, the ability ...... no the right - to own and enjoy a dog has been limited if not outright stolen by fear-mongering, greedy, opportunistic ( multiple choice), kiss-ass politicians who think nothing of trading away property rights, privacy rights, not to mention gambling on the real protection of public health and safety for their own political gain.
Since many of these yoyo's will be asking you to rehire them this fall, I had a laugh-out-loud realization about two recent races that may portend the future in places where breed specific legislation and other anti-dog measures are on the table.
The election results of these races tell me that you, loyal readers, and you alone - went to the polls and sent these candidates a very clear message.......... My Dog Votes!
Defeated
Jackie Speier - Candidate for Lt. Governor in California - Author of SB 861 (infamous bill allowing breed-specific measures in a state that prohibits them)
Jackie Speier and her supporters angered dog owners not just in California, but across the country and across the aisle. She especially pissed off dog-owning members of her own party, prompting letters that said:
"I have voted for you in the past and I very well might have done so again last Tuesday except for one thing - SB 861. That absolutely wrong-headed bill shows a total lack of understanding of canine ethology and a willingness to capitalize on a family's personal tragedy for political gain, trampling the rights of all California dog owners in the process. I know dozens of Democrats among my fellow dog enthusiasts who also did not vote for you for exactly the same reason".
Jackie lost her bid to become Lt. Governor in the California Democratic primary earlier this year. Bye Bye, Jackie!
Flip Flop Fever
Darryl Dexter - New Democratic Party Leader, Nova Scotia
In a hotly contested provincial race in Nova Scotia, Canada, where Ontario's province-wide breed ban in Ontario has pushed the issue of breed specific legislation onto the front burner throughout the country, New Democratic Party Leader Darryl Dexter told the leading papers that "Personally, I Support Breed-Specific Legislation".
Darry Dexter's position supporting BSL caused such furor amongst dog-owners that his position
even endangered the outcome of races of other members of his own party.
Three day's later, Mr. Dexter issued a statement to the paper, saying he did not support breed-specific legislation and that his "secretary made a mistake" with the quote. Yeah, right.
By flip-flopping on his position on breed bans, Darryl Dexter
saved his own sorry ass in that race, as well as the political careers of candidates running on the New Democratic Party Platform.
Note To Candidates
If you're running for office in any local or state race, I have a message for you - maybe you should pay attention:



















If you go to http://www.bobcasey.com/actioncenter/
You can join their campaign and fill out the "other" box for why you support Casey. In there, I put "opposition to PAWS"
Posted by: Little Darling | October 16, 2006 at 12:44 PM
My Dog (and many others!) will be voting in October 2007 to defeat the Ontario Liberals, who made responsible dog owners into second class citizens and demonized their unoffending dogs with unfounded and untrue statements.
Posted by: Dianne Singer | September 22, 2006 at 07:58 AM
In July of this year, I have lost my precious Pit Bull Terrier to BSL, and those that have unlimited power, meaning animal control in our town. They did many fraudulant things, and abused their power to obtain our dog, and then killed him. It went to court at a city level, which they sabotaged, and we lost at a superior court level to try to save his life. They made him a potentially dangerous dog at 3mths. of age, if you can believe this. Patti Koehne
Posted by: Patti Koehne | September 17, 2006 at 10:43 PM
I urge all voters across the country to help us send a message about PAWS in the defeat of Senator Santorum and the education of his opponent Bob Casey. Send a check to Casey's campaign for $11.39 along with a note telling Casey's people WHY you are sending this amount (in opposition to Senate Bill 1139 - PAWS) Let's send a message to the politicians that our dogs VOTE!!
Posted by: Elizabeth Brinkley | September 17, 2006 at 05:02 PM